SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
OrganizationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00017745.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed Aug 10, 2022) documenting the cross-examination of a witness referred to as 'Jane'. The questioning focuses on Jane's communications regarding the Epstein case, specifically confirming that she spoke with Stan Pottinger, her ex-boyfriend Matt, and some family members. The defense attorney attempts to establish that her knowledge of the Epstein case is influenced by these conversations and press coverage.
DOJ-OGR-00017742.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The questioning focuses on establishing that Jane hired two personal injury lawyers, Mr. Glassman and Mr. Werksman, on September 3, 2019, just two weeks before her first meeting with the government. Jane confirms she hired them based on advice from her husband's friend, rather than seeking a specialist in victims' rights.
DOJ-OGR-00017741.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, Ghislaine Maxwell trial) documenting the cross-examination of a witness identified as 'Jane'. The questioning focuses on her hiring of a personal injury lawyer, Mr. Glassman, on September 3, 2019, executed via a contingent fee contract (Exhibit J-14). The defense attempts to ask about Glassman's advertising regarding large verdicts, but an objection regarding hearsay is sustained.
DOJ-OGR-00017740.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The questioning focuses on events in 2019, establishing that Jane was contacted by the media and an Agent Amanda Young before Epstein's arrest. The transcript reveals Jane was initially uninterested in getting involved but later hired a new attorney, Mr. Glassman.
DOJ-OGR-00017739.jpg
This document is a transcript page from the cross-examination of a witness identified as 'Jane' in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The witness denies having $1 million or agreeing to a $250,000 retainer, stating she cannot afford such amounts. However, she confirms paying $25,000 to an unspecified individual to help stop media harassment and bullying regarding interview requests, and acknowledges speaking with lawyers representing Virginia Roberts.
DOJ-OGR-00017738.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The questioning focuses on Jane hiring a 'tough litigator' around 2015 to counter press allegations that she was a 'Yugoslavian sex slave'. The examination probes into payments made to this lawyer, specifically questioning a 'quarter of a million dollars' amount which Jane denies in this testimony, and confirms she spoke with the government on September 2, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00017737.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a cross-examination of a witness identified as 'Jane'. The questioning focuses on the late 2000s (2007-2008), establishing that Jane was aware of Epstein's arrest and investigation via the news but chose not to contact authorities at that time. It further establishes that Jane hired a lawyer only after seeing press coverage that mentioned her specifically.
DOJ-OGR-00017735.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a legal cross-examination, likely a deposition or court testimony, dated August 10, 2022. The witness, identified as Jane, is questioned about commercial flights paid for by an unidentified male, sending a photograph with a note ('Thanks for rocking my world') to Epstein when she was 19, and her mother's alleged involvement in making her send it. The testimony also references exhibits and the lack of dates on photographs.
DOJ-OGR-00017734.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a legal cross-examination, filed on August 10, 2022, involving a witness identified as 'Jane.' The questioning focuses on her interactions with 'the government' regarding trial preparation and a mock cross-examination, as well as her travel with 'Mr. Epstein' on his private jet after 1999. Jane confirms meetings and preparation with the government but denies continuous travel with Epstein after 1999, admitting to only one flight on his private jet.
DOJ-OGR-00017733.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a cross-examination of a witness named 'Jane'. The questioning focuses on her lack of physical evidence to support claims about her relationship with 'Epstein', including his alleged possession of a photo of her and his payment for her acting and voice lessons. The witness confirms she has no records of these payments or other events from that time, such as a trip to see 'the Lion King'.
DOJ-OGR-00017731.jpg
This document is a transcript of a cross-examination of a witness named Jane. She clarifies that she knew individuals named Emmy and Michelle in New York, not Florida. Jane confirms that as a 14-year-old, she stayed at Mr. Epstein's staffed, eight-story mansion in New York and that Epstein gave her "hundreds of dollars at a time" on a regular basis.
DOJ-OGR-00017730.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The questioner confronts Jane with a prior statement she allegedly made to the government about receiving phone calls from someone named Emmy in Florida when she was a teenager. Jane denies making the statement and claims the written record of it is incorrect, leading to objections from her counsel, Ms. Moe, and rulings from the court.
DOJ-OGR-00017728.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The witness denies being shown photographs of several women (Sophie, Emmy, Michelle, Eva, Kelly) by the government. However, the witness confirms remembering being on flights with Prince Andrew and Mark Epstein, who is identified as Jeffrey's brother.
DOJ-OGR-00017727.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) depicting a sidebar conference during the cross-examination of a witness identified as 'Jane'. Prosecutor Ms. Moe objects to defense questions regarding investigative techniques (specifically showing photographs), citing a previously granted motion in limine. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger attempts to complain about the excessive number of objections, but the Court dismisses the concern, stating the record is clear.
DOJ-OGR-00017726.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It details a portion of the cross-examination of a witness named Jane, who is asked if she has seen pictures of someone named Sophie since September 2019. An attorney, Ms. Moe, objects, and another attorney, Ms. Menninger, provides 'Lack of evidence' as the grounds, which the judge questions.
DOJ-OGR-00017725.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a court cross-examination transcript dated August 10, 2022, involving a witness identified as 'Jane.' The questioning focuses on Jane's associations with individuals named Emmy, Michelle, and Kelly, and her claims regarding their involvement in 'sexual contact' and 'group massages.' It also touches upon Jane's prior interactions with government agents and prosecutors, including her ability to identify individuals from pictures and statements made during an initial meeting in September.
DOJ-OGR-00017724.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The questioner confirms Jane's previous statements about the involvement of three other women—Sophie, Emmy, and Michelle—in events described as a 'group scenario,' 'abuse,' and 'group sexualized massages.' Jane affirms that these women were present and participated in the events.
DOJ-OGR-00017722.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The questioning focuses on Jane's previous testimony about her participation in recurring 'group sexualized massages' and her specific recollection of another participant, a massage therapist named Sophie. The questioner probes Jane's memory of Sophie's profession and physical attributes.
DOJ-OGR-00017719.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The questioning establishes that Mr. Epstein introduced Jane to Donald Trump and took her to Mar-a-Lago when she claimed to be 14, where she met Trump. The questioning also briefly touches on her schooling and an unspecified "pool house incident".
DOJ-OGR-00017718.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The questioner presses Jane on whether she recalls telling the government in December 2019 that she was introduced to the dean of Interlochen by Epstein at a cocktail party. Jane repeatedly states she does not remember or recall this event, though she does confirm remembering meeting the dean of admissions for Julliard.
DOJ-OGR-00017716.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The questioning focuses on a trip she took to a large ranch in New Mexico, with the attorney asking if she recalls being accompanied by Mark Epstein (Jeffrey Epstein's brother) and Chef Adam Perry Ling. The witness repeatedly states that she does not recall these details or the existence of a massage room at the New Mexico property.
DOJ-OGR-00017715.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness named 'Jane', filed on August 10, 2022. The questioning focuses on confirming details of Jane's stays at an eight-story mansion on New York's Upper East Side, which belonged to Epstein and which she began visiting at age 14. The witness confirms these details but states she does not know if another individual, Ghislaine, lived at the mansion.
DOJ-OGR-00017713.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the cross-examination of a witness referred to as 'Jane.' Attorney Ms. Menninger questions Jane about a prior interview with the government, specifically regarding whether Jane remembered any specific abuse occurring during trips to New Mexico. The witness states she does not recall making the statements presented to her, and the prosecution (Ms. Moe) objects to the form of the questioning.
DOJ-OGR-00017712.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. An attorney, Ms. Menninger, questions Jane about her recollection of an alleged abuse incident in New Mexico and her prior statements to the government. Jane repeatedly states that she does not recall the events or making the statements in question.
DOJ-OGR-00017711.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of a witness named 'Jane'. The defense attorney questions Jane about her first trip to New Mexico on a private plane and attempts to impeach her testimony using a government interview record from February 2020 (referenced as document 3509-008). Jane explicitly denies the accuracy of the government record, stating she did not tell them she recalled 'no specific abuse' during that trip.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity