This legal document, part of a court filing from April 16, 2021, presents an argument about the jurisdictional scope of plea agreements. The author refutes a defendant's motion by citing case law, primarily *Annabi*, to argue that a plea agreement only binds the specific U.S. Attorney's Office that made it, unless it explicitly states a broader scope. The document contrasts this with the defendant's argument that without an explicit limitation, an agreement should bind the entire federal government.
This document summarizes the legal case of Lear Siegler, Inc. v. Lehman. The Ninth Circuit initially ruled that the President acted in bad faith by refusing to comply with the Competition in Contracting Act and awarded attorneys' fees to Lear Siegler. However, upon a rehearing en banc, the court reversed its decision, ruling that Lear Siegler was not a prevailing party and withdrew the prior opinion.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity