A. Oosterbaan
PersonRelationship Network
EFTA00013989.pdf
This document is a letter from Kenneth Starr to a high-ranking DOJ official arguing against the federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. Starr alleges significant prosecutorial misconduct, including violations of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), leaks to the New York Times, and conflicts of interest within the US Attorney's Office. He claims the prosecution is politically motivated by Epstein's ties to Bill Clinton and requests a 'de novo' independent review of the case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012131.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal letter from Kirkland & Ellis LLP to John Roth, dated June 19, 2008. The firm argues that a previous review of the Epstein case by the DOJ/CEOS was insufficient and requests a true 'de novo' review, citing recent Supreme Court decisions (*Santos* and *Cuellar*) that weaken the federal case. The letter complains that AUSA Villafana has violated the Non-Prosecution Agreement by re-initiating a grand jury investigation and subpoenaing a [redacted] individual to provide testimony and documents (photos, emails, phone records) on July 1, 2008.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012137.jpg
This document is a letter from Kirkland & Ellis LLP to John Roth, Esq., dated June 19, 2008, arguing against the federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. The firm requests a 'de novo' independent review, citing the existence of a Non-Prosecution Agreement and a State plea deal, while accusing AUSA Villafana of misconduct for re-initiating a grand jury investigation and subpoenaing a redacted individual for documents including photos and emails.
Referenced as Tab 38
Cited regarding the Department's prior review.
Tab 38
Referenced regarding the Department's prior review.
Review of the matter
Referenced as Tab 38; admitted review was not 'de novo'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity