| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Judge Kaplan
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal hearing | A court hearing was held via video conference for Prince Andrew's case, where his lawyer argued f... | N/A | View |
| 2022-01-01 | N/A | Hearing on motion to dismiss Prince Andrew civil case. | Video Conference | View |
This document details two related legal matters. First, it provides an inside account from a juror named Scotty on the deliberations in the Ghislaine Maxwell sex trafficking trial, explaining how the jury reached its verdict. Second, it reports on a court hearing for Prince Andrew, where Judge Kaplan appeared highly skeptical of arguments made by the prince's lawyer, Andrew Brettler, who sought to use a 2009 settlement between victim Virginia Roberts and Jeffrey Epstein to have the case dismissed.
This document is a printed Daily Mail article filed as a court exhibit (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It covers two main topics: an interview with a juror named 'Scotty' detailing the deliberations and voting splits in the Ghislaine Maxwell sex trafficking trial, and a separate legal hearing where Judge Kaplan appeared dismissive of Prince Andrew's lawyer's attempts to use a 2009 Epstein settlement to dismiss a civil suit by Virginia Roberts. The document highlights specific vote counts for the Maxwell charges and Judge Kaplan's skepticism toward Prince Andrew's defense arguments.
Arguments regarding motion to dismiss Prince Andrew's case.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity