| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
location
LEE
|
Inquiry official correspondence |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Detention | Ms. Maxwell's pre-sentence detention under conditions described as long-term isolation, unusual r... | MDC | View |
| 2020-09-04 | N/A | Internal search for Jeffrey Epstein's suicide reconstruction report initiated by requests from OI... | Central Office / NYM | View |
| 2019-08-14 | N/A | Email exchange regarding the aftermath of Jeffrey Epstein's death ('I/M Epstien situation') and t... | MCC New York (context) | View |
| 2019-08-13 | N/A | Staffing request initiated to send Lieutenants (LTs) on Temporary Duty (TDY) to NYM (MCC New York... | NYM | View |
| 2019-08-12 | N/A | Internal government discussion regarding media speculation on Jeffrey Epstein's removal from suic... | N/A | View |
| 2019-08-11 | N/A | Inquiry and explanation regarding BOP suicide watch protocols following Jeffrey Epstein's death (... | Email Correspondence | View |
| 2019-08-11 | N/A | Email discussion regarding media speculation about Jeffrey Epstein's removal from Suicide Watch. | N/A | View |
| 2019-08-11 | N/A | Communication regarding BOP suicide watch policies and justifications for ending suicide watch, l... | BOP | View |
Page 8 of a Protective Order filed on July 30, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The document outlines strict protocols for the Defendant's review of discovery materials, mandating supervision by Defense Counsel or BOP officials, and defines the handling of 'Highly Confidential Information,' prohibiting the dissemination of copies to potential witnesses.
This document is page 9 of a court filing (Document 29-1) from July 27, 2020, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (US v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It outlines strict protocols for the handling of discovery materials, specifically those designated as 'Highly Confidential Information.' It details that the Defendant may only review materials in the presence of counsel or BOP officials, and sets rules for showing materials to potential defense witnesses via read-only means without providing physical copies.
This document is page 8 of a Protective Order filed on August 20, 2020, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It outlines strict protocols for the Defendant's review of discovery materials, mandating supervision by Defense Counsel or BOP officials, and establishes rules for handling 'Highly Confidential Information' produced by the Government.
This document is page 8 of a legal filing (Protective Order) from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on July 28, 2020. It outlines strict protocols for the handling of 'Highly Confidential Information' during the discovery process, specifically dictating that the Defendant may only review materials in the presence of counsel or via BOP officials, and establishing rules for showing materials to potential defense witnesses without providing them copies.
This document is page 9 of a protective order filed on July 27, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It establishes strict protocols for the handling of discovery materials, stating that the Defendant may only review them in the presence of counsel or via BOP officials. It further defines 'Highly Confidential Information' and restricts Potential Defense Witnesses to viewing materials via read-only platforms without receiving physical copies.
This is page 8 of a court order (Protective Order) filed on July 30, 2020, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The text outlines strict protocols for the Defendant's review of discovery materials, mandating the presence of counsel or BOP officials. It also establishes rules for showing materials to potential witnesses without providing them copies and begins defining 'Highly Confidential Information' produced by the Government.
This legal document argues that the government misrepresented information to the court regarding the treatment of inmate Ms. Maxwell. The government initially claimed that flashlight checks every 15 minutes were a routine procedure, but later admitted in a letter that Ms. Maxwell is the only inmate subjected to this treatment. The document contends this is a form of mistreatment being justified without proper evidence, such as an affidavit.
Ultimatum: If mail is not received by 9:30 AM, an order to show cause will be filed.
Notification that Maxwell still has not received the legal mail deposited on 10/2.
Initial report of missing legal mail deposited on 10/2. Notes that another client in the West Building received theirs.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity