Covington
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
General Flynn
|
Client |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-05-22 | N/A | Submission of legal letter declining document production based on Fifth Amendment privilege. | Washington D.C. (implied) | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031674.jpg
This document is Page 5 of a legal letter from the law firm Covington, addressed to Senators Richard Burr and Mark Warner, dated May 22, 2017. It argues on behalf of General Flynn (Michael Flynn) against a subpoena demanding lists of meetings and communications with Russian officials. The text asserts that complying with these broad demands would force Flynn to create new documents and provide testimony, violating his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. Note: While the user prompt references Epstein, this document text is exclusively related to the Michael Flynn/Russia investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031673.jpg
This document is Page 4 of a legal letter from the law firm Covington to Senators Richard Burr and Mark Warner (Senate Intelligence Committee), dated May 22, 2017. It argues that a subpoena issued to General Michael Flynn is overly broad and that complying with it would violate his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination because the Committee lacks 'reasonable particularity' regarding the existence of the documents. The text details specific subpoena demands for records of Flynn's meetings and communications with Russian officials and the Trump campaign between 2015 and 2017. Note: Despite the user prompt, this document pertains to the Russia investigation/Michael Flynn, not Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031671.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal letter from the law firm Covington to Senators Richard Burr and Mark Warner regarding General Michael Flynn. It argues that General Flynn is exercising his Fifth Amendment privilege to decline a Congressional subpoena for documents, citing that the act of production is testimonial in nature and could be used against him in ongoing investigations, including one by a newly appointed special counsel. The document cites legal precedents including *Watkins v. United States* and *United States v. Hubbell* to support the refusal.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017073.jpg
This document is a page from the attendee list of the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011. It lists high-profile individuals alphabetically from 'E' to 'F', including their roles, organizations, and countries of origin. Notably, the document includes a 'David R. Epstein' of Novartis AG, who is a pharmaceutical executive and not the financier Jeffrey Epstein, despite the shared surname.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity