This document is a corrected motion for joinder in a legal case, filed on January 2, 2015, by Jane Doe #3 and Jane Doe #4, seeking to join an existing lawsuit against the United States. The motion details allegations of sexual abuse and sex trafficking by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell against Jane Doe #3, including forced sexual relations with Alan Dershowitz, and argues that the new victims' circumstances are relevant to the court's assessment of their joinder.
This document is a printed article (likely from Vanity Fair by Michael Wolff, based on context) faxed to the State Attorney's Office in 2008. It details Epstein's predatory behavior, including specific accounts from teenage victims (ages 14, 16, 17), descriptions of his home, and his defense strategies involving Alan Dershowitz and private investigators. The text highlights Epstein's self-delusion regarding his actions, his financial donations to Ballet Florida, and intimidation tactics used against victims.
This document is page 27 (marked xxvi) of a court filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on April 16, 2021. It contains a 'Table of Authorities' listing legal statutes, rules (Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and Evidence), and other academic or congressional authorities cited in the brief. The page includes a DOJ Bates stamp (DOJ-OGR-00002961).
This article details the Palm Beach police investigation into Jeffrey Epstein initiated in March 2005 after a mother reported her 14-year-old daughter had been molested. It outlines police surveillance tactics, the recruitment role of Haley Robson, and the subsequent interference by Epstein's private investigators and legal team, including Roy Black and Alan Dershowitz. The document also highlights Epstein's lavish lifestyle, charitable donations to local police, and past associations with figures like Donald Trump and Michael Stroll.
This document is an excerpt from the book 'Filthy Rich' (pages 234-235), labeled as a House Oversight exhibit. It details Jeffrey Epstein's association with Al Seckel, a 'grifter' with whom he hosted the 2010 Mindshift conference in the Virgin Islands, attended by notable scientists like Murray Gell-Mann and Gerald Sussman. The text also describes a 2012 conference at Little St. James attended by Stephen Hawking and other physicists, while noting that institutions like Mount Sinai and Ballet Palm Beach had begun rejecting Epstein's donations.
This document appears to be a scanned page (p. 226) from a book by James Patterson (likely 'Filthy Rich'), included in a House Oversight evidence file. The text analyzes the psychology of Jeffrey Epstein, speculating on his lack of guilt regarding his crimes and his shared elitist worldview with Prince Andrew. The adjacent page features commentary from Dr. Anna Salter, a psychologist, using a 'car brakes' analogy to explain sexual offenses.
This document consists of pages 92 and 93 from a biography about Jeffrey Epstein, labeled with a House Oversight footer. It details his early life (1969-1976), specifically his time at Cooper Union starting at age 16, his Brooklyn accent, and his tutoring work. It also includes recollections from a classmate, James Rosen, regarding their upbringing in Sea Gate/Lafayette and the ethnic tensions of the neighborhood.
This document is an excerpt from the book 'Filthy Rich' (marked as House Oversight evidence) detailing Jeffrey Epstein's association with Al Seckel, a 'self-professed PhD' and grifter. It describes two scientific conferences hosted by Epstein: the 2010 Mindshift conference in the Virgin Islands (co-hosted with Seckel) and a 2012 gathering on Little St. James attended by Stephen Hawking and other physicists. The text also notes the shutdown of Epstein's foundations and the refusal of future donations by organizations like Mount Sinai Hospital and Ballet Palm Beach.
This document contains pages 226 and 227 from a book (likely James Patterson's 'Filthy Rich'), marked as evidence for the House Oversight Committee. Chapter 59 details an analysis by Dr. Anna Salter from November 2015, where she explains the psychology of child sex offenders like Jeffrey Epstein using an analogy of a car's motor (impulses) versus its brakes (control). The text also explicitly links Prince Andrew to Epstein, questioning their public association and shared accusations.
This document, marked as Exhibit R, details allegations from a court filing stating that Jeffrey Epstein forced a minor, Jane Doe #3, to have sexual relations with Alan Dershowitz and Prince Andrew. It includes denials from Dershowitz, who threatens legal action against the accuser's lawyers, and a denial from Buckingham Palace regarding Prince Andrew's involvement.
This document is a printout of a Law&Crime article from December 2018, filed as a court exhibit in April 2019. The article details an interview where Alan Dershowitz vehemently denies sexual abuse allegations made by Virginia Roberts, calling her a 'certified liar' and claiming he has conclusive travel records proving his innocence. The text also mentions the settlement of a civil case against Jeffrey Epstein by attorney Bradley Edwards.
This document is a biographical list of high-profile individuals from the technology, political, and academic sectors, possibly serving as a guest list for a conference or retreat (such as the Dialog Retreat mentioned in Auren Hoffman's bio). It includes the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017584', indicating it is part of a House Oversight Committee investigation. Notably, the list includes a 'Jeff Epstein,' who is identified as the former CFO of Oracle, distinct from the financier Jeffrey Epstein typically associated with such investigations.
This document is a contact or attendee list containing biographical details for high-profile individuals in business, technology, politics, and academia. It includes names such as Garry Kasparov, Henry Kravis, Max Levchin, and former government officials like Neal Katyal and Juliette Kayyem. The document appears to be from 2011 or later, based on the mention of a 2011 award winner.
This document appears to be a page from a memoir or autobiographical legal filing by Alan Dershowitz (identified by his specific book titles and family members). It details his career evolution from academic to 'celebrity lawyer' representing billionaires, his personal family life, and his shift in his 60s toward political advocacy for Israel. The document is stamped with a House Oversight Committee Bates number.
This document appears to be a page from a memoir or manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz given the biographical details) describing the author's transition from a pure academic at Harvard to a practicing appellate lawyer. The shift was precipitated by financial need when his 10-year-old son, Elon, was diagnosed with brain cancer, requiring the author to borrow money from Judge Bazelon and subsequently take on paid legal cases. The text details his initial legal fees of $35/hour and his philosophy of balancing teaching with practice.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir draft written by Alan Dershowitz, dated April 2, 2012. In the text, Dershowitz discusses his philosophy on criminal defense, explaining why he represents guilty clients and referencing his past work on high-profile cases like Claus Von Bulow and O.J. Simpson. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional inquiry.
This document is page 162 of a manuscript, bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. The text appears to be written by Alan Dershowitz (identified by the claim of being the clerk who drafted the 'Rudolph' opinion for Justice Goldberg). It discusses the legal history of the death penalty for rape, specifically the backlash from the Georgia Supreme Court against federal intervention, scholarly criticism from Herbert Packer, and the subsequent formation of a litigation project by the ACLU and NAACP.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or book draft (dated 4.2.12) written by a legal scholar (likely Alan Dershowitz). The text discusses the tension between privacy rights and the First Amendment, citing personal attacks by Norman Finkelstein and the historical legal framework established by Louis Brandeis. It details the specific legal case of Brooke Shields attempting to stop the publication of nude photos taken of her as a child, noting that the author advised a former student representing Shields that the case would be difficult due to laws against prior restraint.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir by Alan Dershowitz, submitted as evidence to the House Oversight Committee (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017221). It details Dershowitz's historical defense of a professor named Franklin at Stanford University, his collaboration with research assistant Joel Klein, and his public conflict with Stanford President Lyman regarding First Amendment rights. The text describes the Faculty Committee's decision to fire Franklin for urging students to occupy a computation center and Dershowitz's subsequent lecture criticizing the faculty's stance on civil liberties.
The author, likely Alan Dershowitz, reflects on his early career at Harvard Law School, recounting his tenure process involving a critical article on law and psychiatry and his mentor Judge Bazelon. He details a salary negotiation that led to a universal raise for faculty, coined "the Dershowitz bump," and lists his prolific writing output and the diverse range of courses he has taught.
A forensic log of messages from June 15, 2019, between an account associated with Jeffrey Epstein (jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual. The conversation covers personnel issues ('Darren awol'), offers to intervene with legal counsel, comments on the Hong Kong extradition news, and requests a schedule for travel to key locations including the 'Ranch', 'Island', Paris, and Harvard. The document bears a House Oversight Committee stamp.
A digital message log from December 1, 2018, detailing a conversation between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias e:jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual. The discussion focuses on Chinese geopolitics, specifically the CCP leadership and reformists. The conversation concludes with the redacted individual sharing their schedule, mentioning a trip to Harvard and a scheduled lunch with Tom Pritzker in New York on the following Monday.
This document is a forensic extraction of an iMessage chat log from December 1, 2018, between 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted recipient. Epstein invites the recipient to meet Nobel Prize winner Richard Axel and mathematician Misha Grosov (likely Mikhail Gromov) at 5:00 PM, presumably at Harvard. The recipient declines the invitation, stating they 'Can't make harvard,' and Epstein acknowledges the decline.
This document is a reprint of a 2015 article from The American Lawyer featuring an interview with Alan Dershowitz. In the interview, Dershowitz defends his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, explaining he was introduced by Lady de Rothschild and that Epstein was a major donor to Harvard ($50 million). The text outlines the legal context, including the 2008 plea deal and lawsuits filed by lawyers Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell alleging Dershowitz's involvement in sexual misconduct.
This document is a page from a House Oversight report (marked 010480) displaying a collage of evidentiary photographs related to Jeffrey Epstein. It includes photos of Epstein with Ghislaine Maxwell at Mar-a-Lago (1995), Epstein with Alan Dershowitz (2004), and Prince Andrew with Maxwell and a redacted minor in London. The document also features photos of redacted young women (ages 15 and 17) allegedly taken by Epstein at various locations including New York, London, and Zorro Ranch, citing affidavits from the US District Southern Court of Florida.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity