Event Details
July 16, 2019
Description
Document 22 was filed in case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Epstein's counsel (implied) | person | 0 | View Entity |
| court | location | 177 | View Entity |
Source Documents (3)
DOJ-OGR-00000436.jpg
This document is page 6 of a legal filing dated July 16, 2019, addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman. The author refutes the judge's suggestion that sex offender recidivism rates increase after 15 years, citing two studies that conclude the opposite. The document also mentions a New Mexico detective, Deborah Anaya, and speculation by a third-party counsel, Mr. Boies, regarding alleged payments in late 2018.
DOJ-OGR-00000433.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal filing addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman, dated July 16, 2019. The author argues that denying bail to a defendant based on their wealth is unconstitutional, violating the Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments by thwarting the presumption of innocence and due process. The document cites several federal court cases as precedent to support the claim that suitable conditions for release can be found even in presumption cases.
DOJ-OGR-00000435.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 16, 2019, argues for specific release conditions for a defendant named Epstein. It highlights that Epstein's brother, Mark, is prepared to co-sign a release bond with his net worth exceeding $100 million to ensure Epstein's appearance in court. The document also clarifies that in August 2010, the New Mexico Public Safety Department advised Epstein he was not required to register there based on his 2008 Florida conviction.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
The Court is evaluating the Defendant's flight risk and proposed conditions for release, such as renouncing citizenship and financial oversight.
Date unknown
Date the second sharing order was signed according to email recollection.
2020-02-04 • New York
Evaluation of Maxwell's appeal of a Protective Order.
Date unknown
Voir dire process where Juror 50 stated he had no doubt about his ability to be fair and impartial.
Date unknown
Jury deliberations during which the jury sent a note inquiring about the proper basis to convict under Count Four.
Date unknown
The document is an argument concerning the sentencing of Ms. Maxwell, specifically regarding the application of guideline § 4B1.5.
Date unknown
Initial Pretrial Conference set to occur.
2019-12-06 • Court
The document discusses arguments and evidence to be presented at an upcoming trial, including the Government's intention to argue certain individuals are co-conspirators.
Date unknown
Defendant points the Court to civil law regarding plaintiffs proceeding by pseudonyms
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event