January 01, 1998
United States v. McVeigh decision (cited in footnote).
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Timothy McVeigh | person | 6 | View Entity |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017639.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (likely authored by Paul Cassell) analyzing the history of federal victims' rights legislation. It details the failure of the 1990 Victims' Rights and Restitution Act, attributing its ineffectiveness to poor codification (Title 42 vs Title 18) and its omission from West Publishing's legal guides, citing the Oklahoma City bombing case as a key example. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp and the name of David Schoen, Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, suggesting it was part of a legal production regarding the CVRA, a statute central to the controversy surrounding Epstein's non-prosecution agreement.
Events with shared participants
United States v. McVeigh legal proceedings and appeals regarding victims' rights to attend trial
1996-01-01 • 10th Circuit Court
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event