Event Details

January 01, 1998

Description

United States v. McVeigh decision (cited in footnote).

Participants (1)

Name Type Mentions
Timothy McVeigh person 6 View Entity

Source Documents (1)

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017639.jpg

Legal Scholarship / Evidence Production (Law Review Article) • 2.26 MB
View

This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (likely authored by Paul Cassell) analyzing the history of federal victims' rights legislation. It details the failure of the 1990 Victims' Rights and Restitution Act, attributing its ineffectiveness to poor codification (Title 42 vs Title 18) and its omission from West Publishing's legal guides, citing the Oklahoma City bombing case as a key example. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp and the name of David Schoen, Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, suggesting it was part of a legal production regarding the CVRA, a statute central to the controversy surrounding Epstein's non-prosecution agreement.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

United States v. McVeigh legal proceedings and appeals regarding victims' rights to attend trial

1996-01-01 • 10th Circuit Court

View

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
10th Circuit Court
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
1
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-19 22:10

Additional Data

Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017639.jpg
Date String
1998

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event