January 25, 2021
Filing of Document 120 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Court | organization | 2003 | View Entity |
| Ms. Maxwell | person | 1982 | View Entity |
| Defense counsel | person | 578 | View Entity |
| court | location | 177 | View Entity |
| GHISLAINE MAXWELL | person | 9575 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00002282(1).jpg
This document is a Table of Authorities page (page iii) from a legal filing submitted on January 25, 2021, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It lists relevant statutes including 18 U.S.C. § 1623 (perjury), § 2422 (coercion/enticement), and § 2423(a) (transportation of minors), as well as Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure regarding joinder and severance of charges.
DOJ-OGR-00002283.jpg
This document is page 5 of a legal filing (Document 120) dated January 25, 2021, in the case of USA v. Maxwell. It contains the Introduction section of a motion requesting the severance of Counts Five and Six (perjury charges related to 2016 depositions) from Counts One through Four (trafficking charges from 1994-1997). The defense argues that joining these counts prejudices Maxwell by introducing unrelated allegations from Virginia Roberts Giuffre, who is described in the text as having made false accusations against various high-profile figures.
DOJ-OGR-00002284.jpg
This document is page 6 of a legal filing (Document 120) dated January 25, 2021, from the case U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines the 'Mann Act Counts' (Counts One through Four) of the indictment, detailing allegations that Maxwell conspired with Jeffrey Epstein between 1994 and 1997 to transport individuals for illegal sexual activity in New York, Florida, New Mexico, and London. It specifically notes the involvement of three accusers (Accuser-1, -2, and -3) and argues for the severance of Counts Five and Six to avoid juror confusion.
DOJ-OGR-00001127.jpg
This document is a page from a legal defense filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. The defense contends that Maxwell was not evading law enforcement but rather the press, evidenced by her use of a trackable cellphone. It further argues she is not a flight risk to France or the UK because she has irrevocably waived extradition rights and chose to remain in the US following Jeffrey Epstein's arrest and death.
DOJ-OGR-00001264.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (dated March 23, 2021) arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail, citing the Reform Act and proposing a strict bail package including an eight-figure bond, renunciation of foreign citizenship, and asset monitoring by a retired judge. The text argues that her continued detention impairs her ability to prepare for trial and subjects her to a 'trial by public opinion.' A lengthy footnote details poor detention conditions at the MDC, including delayed legal mail, technical issues with electronic discovery, and ventilation issues in visiting rooms characterized by an expert as a 'death trap.'
DOJ-OGR-00001131.jpg
A page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) dated December 14, 2020, arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. The text cites an expert, Mr. Julié, who argues that France would not protect Maxwell from extradition to the U.S. if she fled there, citing her U.S. citizenship, waiver of rights, and diplomatic interests. A footnote notes that French authorities have broadened their investigation into Jeffrey Epstein to include Maxwell, reducing her incentive to flee to France.
DOJ-OGR-00002281.jpg
This document is page 'ii' (3 of 19) of a legal filing from January 25, 2021, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It is a 'Table of Authorities' section listing various legal precedents (cases) cited in the main document, including United States v. Halper and United States v. Burke. The document bears a Department of Justice Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR-00002281'.
Events with shared participants
Notice of Appearance as Substitute Counsel filed on behalf of Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell
2021-03-30 • 02nd Circuit Court of Appeals
A shipment discussed in court, sent from Ghislaine Maxwell to Casey Wasserman. The event is stated to have occurred in 'October'.
Date unknown
The Court announced a 15-minute morning break for the jury.
2022-08-10
LETTER REPLY TO RESPONSE to Motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell.
2020-07-29
Ms. Maxwell has been incarcerated for 225 days in de facto solitary confinement, monitored 24 hours a day by guards with a handheld camera.
2021-02-16 • MDC
A discussion took place regarding the order of witnesses for the day's trial proceedings.
2022-08-10 • courthouse
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
Ms. Maxwell is being forced to prepare for trial with a computer that cannot do research or search documents, which is argued to be an inconceivable condition for preparation.
Date unknown • prison/jail
Filing or processing of the Reply Memorandum in Support of Third Motion for Bail
2021-04-01 • Federal Court (Implied)
The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event