Event Details

May 19, 2008

Description

CEOS Review

Participants (3)

Name Type Mentions
Mr. Acosta person 12 View Entity
CEOS organization 151 View Entity
Acosta person 475 View Entity

Source Documents (3)

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025356.jpg

Legal Correspondence / Letter (Page 4) • 2.6 MB
View

This document is page 4 of a legal letter addressed to the Honorable Mark Filip, dated May 19, 2008. The text argues against federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein, claiming his conduct was 'purely local' and did not violate federal statutes regarding human trafficking or sex tourism (§ 1591, § 2422, § 2423). It criticizes a CEOS review that found U.S. Attorney Acosta would not be abusing discretion by prosecuting, arguing that such prosecution would be a 'novel application' of the law and that the matter should be left to Florida state prosecutors.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019227.jpg

Legal Correspondence / Memorandum • 2.62 MB
View

This document is page 4 of a legal memorandum dated May 19, 2008, addressed to Honorable Mark Filip. It argues against the federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein, asserting that his conduct was 'purely local,' 'consensual,' and did not meet the thresholds for federal statutes regarding human trafficking (§ 1591), internet predation (§ 2422), or sex tourism (§ 2423). The text critiques a CEOS review and U.S. Attorney Acosta's potential use of discretion, claiming that federal involvement would be an unprecedented overreach into state jurisdiction.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025354.jpg

Legal Correspondence / Letter (Page 2) • 2.67 MB
View

This document is page 2 of a letter dated May 19, 2008, addressed to the Honorable Mark Filip from Jeffrey Epstein's legal team. The letter argues against federal prosecution, citing a review by CEOS (Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section) initiated by Mr. Acosta which found that while prosecution wasn't impossible, it relied on a 'novel application' of federal law. The authors allege that the USAO in Miami is engaging in misconduct, specifically by commingling criminal law with a civil remedy intended to profit specific lawyers, and request a senior-level review by the Justice Department.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

September agreement

2007-09-01 • Unknown

View

Federal prosecution of Epstein

2006-01-01 • N/A

View

Federal prosecution of Epstein led by Acosta.

2006-01-01 • USA

View

Deadline set by Acosta for prosecutors not to issue victim notification letters (5 p.m. Friday).

2007-12-07

View

Private meeting between Acosta and Lefkowitz at a Marriott hotel in West Palm Beach regarding keeping the deal secret.

Date unknown • Marriott hotel, West Palm Beach

View

Acosta made final edits to the Non-Prosecution Agreement, removing language that required actions from the State Attorney's Office and state court, and sent them to Villafaña.

2007-09-24

View

Acosta's decision to defer victim notification to state authorities concerning Epstein's state plea hearing and sentencing.

Date unknown • N/A

View

Negotiation of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between the USAO (represented by Villafaña, Lourie, and Acosta) and Epstein's defense team.

Date unknown

View

Lourie and Acosta revised a draft of the federal plea agreement.

2007-09-20

View

Acosta advises the Defense that the USAO will defer to the State Attorney regarding victim notification for the State Plea Hearing, but the USAO would notify victims of the Federal Resolution.

2007-12-19

View

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
Unknown
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
3
Source Documents
3
Extracted
2025-11-19 22:37

Additional Data

Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025356.jpg
Date String
Prior to May 19, 2008

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event