Event Details
Unspecified (Proposed)
Description
Hearing to question Juror No. 50
Participants (4)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Juror No. 50 | person | 232 | View Entity |
| The Court | organization | 2003 | View Entity |
| The government | organization | 3113 | View Entity |
| Defense counsel | person | 578 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009058.jpg
This document is page 50 (PDF page 57) of a legal filing dated February 24, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense requests a hearing to question Juror No. 50 regarding potential bias, alleging that at least two jurors gave false answers during voir dire which violated Maxwell's Sixth Amendment rights. The filing argues that Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b) does not prohibit this inquiry as it pertains to juror qualifications rather than the content of deliberations.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The Court announced a 15-minute morning break for the jury.
2022-08-10
A meeting where the government showed the witness (Visoski) records of three flights.
Date unknown
A discussion took place regarding the order of witnesses for the day's trial proceedings.
2022-08-10 • courthouse
The Government entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein.
2007-01-01
Lawyers for accusers met with the Government to convince them to open an investigation of Ms. Maxwell.
2016-01-01
The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.
Date unknown
The Government gave on-the-record assurances to the Court regarding investigative files.
2020-07-14
A discussion between attorneys and the court regarding how to respond to a jury note.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Filing of Document 172-1 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
2021-03-23 • US District Court
A status conference originally scheduled for January 14, 2021, was adjourned to March 17, 2021, at 1:00 p.m. The conference is to be conducted remotely via videoconferencing software.
2021-03-17 • Remote (videoconference)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event