Date Unknown
The creation and handling of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Epstein's counsel, which was kept secret from the victims.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mr. Epstein's counsel | person | 4 | View Entity |
| USAO | organization | 691 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00004606.jpg
This page from an Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) report criticizes the U.S. Attorney's Office (USAO) and the FBI for their handling of communications with victims in the Epstein case. The report finds that the decision to keep the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) secret and the delivery of inconsistent messages left victims feeling ignored and undermined public confidence. Decisions by officials Acosta, Sloman, and Villafaña are noted as contributing factors to these failures in providing transparent and unified communication.
Events with shared participants
Epstein's attorneys challenged the USAO's position regarding victim notification.
2007-12-01 • N/A
Conference call regarding the review of Epstein's devices.
2020-10-19 • Teleconference
USAO's decision to notify victims about eligibility for monetary damages under § 2255, implemented by letters after Epstein's state pleas.
Date unknown • N/A
Negotiations between Epstein's legal team and the USAO, resulting in benefits for Epstein such as a reduction in prison time and other concessions.
Date unknown
Acosta advises the Defense that the USAO will defer to the State Attorney regarding victim notification for the State Plea Hearing, but the USAO would notify victims of the Federal Resolution.
2007-12-19
The Department recused the USAO from all matters relating to Jeffrey Epstein's alleged sexual activities with minor females.
2011-01-01
The USAO created a listing of 32 victims it was prepared to include in federal charges against Epstein.
2008-01-01
A court argument took place where counsel for Epstein made statements.
2019-07-15 • Court
USAO opens federal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein.
2006-05-23
The USAO negotiated with Epstein's defense team, rejecting a provision that would prohibit them from initiating immigration proceedings against two female assistants.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event