Event Details

September 04, 2020

Description

Court Order issued (ECF No. 71)

Participants (1)

Name Type Mentions
court location 177 View Entity

Source Documents (3)

072.pdf

Legal Correspondence / Status Report • 166 KB
View

A legal status report filed on October 1, 2020, by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz on behalf of the Epstein Estate executors (Indyke and Kahn) and the Plaintiff 'VE'. The letter informs Judge Freeman that the Plaintiff has submitted a claim to the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program which is under review, and consequently requests that the civil case remain stayed.

073.pdf

Legal Correspondence / Court Filing (Status Report) • 166 KB
View

This document is a status report letter filed on November 2, 2020, by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Pepper on behalf of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and the Plaintiff 'VE'. It informs Judge Debra C. Freeman that the Plaintiff has submitted a claim to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program which is currently under review. Consequently, both parties jointly request that the ongoing litigation (Case No. 1:19-cv-07625-AJN-DF) remain stayed to preserve resources and judicial economy.

074.pdf

Legal Correspondence / Status Report • 168 KB
View

A legal status report filed on December 1, 2020, by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz regarding the case 'VE v. Darren Indyke and Richard D. Kahn'. The document informs Judge Debra C. Freeman that the plaintiff (VE) has submitted a claim to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program and has received an award offer which she is considering. The parties request that the court case remain stayed while this settlement process concludes.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.

Date unknown

View

The Court is evaluating the Defendant's flight risk and proposed conditions for release, such as renouncing citizenship and financial oversight.

Date unknown

View

Date the second sharing order was signed according to email recollection.

2020-02-04 • New York

View

Evaluation of Maxwell's appeal of a Protective Order.

Date unknown

View

Voir dire process where Juror 50 stated he had no doubt about his ability to be fair and impartial.

Date unknown

View

Jury deliberations during which the jury sent a note inquiring about the proper basis to convict under Count Four.

Date unknown

View

The document is an argument concerning the sentencing of Ms. Maxwell, specifically regarding the application of guideline § 4B1.5.

Date unknown

View

Initial Pretrial Conference set to occur.

2019-12-06 • Court

View

The document discusses arguments and evidence to be presented at an upcoming trial, including the Government's intention to argue certain individuals are co-conspirators.

Date unknown

View

Defendant points the Court to civil law regarding plaintiffs proceeding by pseudonyms

Date unknown

View

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
Court
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
1
Source Documents
3
Extracted
2025-12-26 04:07

Additional Data

Source
073.pdf
Date String
2020-09-04

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event