Event Details
January 01, 1994
Description
Decision in State v. Scher, 278 N.J. Super. 249.
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scher | person | 10 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009133.jpg
This legal document, filed on February 24, 2022, argues against setting aside a jury verdict. It establishes that the standard for doing so is an "exacting hurdle," citing Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b), which severely restricts jurors from testifying about their deliberations. The document contrasts this federal standard with New Jersey state law and clarifies that only specific, improper outside influences, not a juror's personal experiences, can be grounds for such an inquiry.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
State v. Scher, 278 N.J. Super. 249, 263, 650 A.2d 1012 (App. Div. 1994)
1994-01-01 • N.J. Super. App. Div.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event