Event Details

This document is a newspaper profile (likely circa 2006) detailing Jeffrey Epstein's rise from a blue-collar background to a wealthy financier. It highlights his mysterious nature, his high-profile connections including Bill Clinton and Leslie Wexner, his lavish properties, and his legal issues, including a past SEC probe and a Citibank lawsuit. The article also notes his relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell and his financial support of scientists and Democratic politicians.

This document is an evidence photograph showing a shelf of black three-ring binders labeled with various names, locations, and events spanning roughly 2002-2007. The labels reference Jeffrey Epstein ('JE'), Little St. James ('LSJ'), Zorro Ranch ('Zorro'), and Palm Beach ('PB'), along with associates like Jean Luc Brunel, Walter Cronkite, and possibly Ghislaine Maxwell ('GM'). Several labels explicitly mention 'girls', 'nudes', 'kids', and 'chix', suggesting the binders contain photographic evidence related to Epstein's trafficking activities.

This legal document page outlines Attorney Edwards' efforts to pursue discovery against Jeffrey Epstein despite obstruction. It details Edwards' intent to depose Bill Clinton, justifying this based on Clinton's friendship with Ghislaine Maxwell (who is accused in the text of heinous crimes involving minors) and Clinton's travel to Africa on Epstein's plane. It also references a Jane Doe No. 102 who alleged exploitation by Epstein's peers, including royalty.

This document is a letter from Kenneth Starr to a high-ranking DOJ official arguing against the federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. Starr alleges significant prosecutorial misconduct, including violations of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), leaks to the New York Times, and conflicts of interest within the US Attorney's Office. He claims the prosecution is politically motivated by Epstein's ties to Bill Clinton and requests a 'de novo' independent review of the case.

A letter from Kirkland & Ellis LLP to John Roth, Esq. dated June 19, 2008, arguing that the USAO is withholding exculpatory Brady evidence regarding witness interviews. The defense alleges the federal prosecution is politically motivated due to Epstein's ties to Bill Clinton and accuses prosecutors AUSA Villafana and FAUSA Sloman of specific ethical misconduct and conflicts of interest.