Event Details
Date Unknown
Description
A trial where the Defendant is arguing she suffered prejudice due to a delay in prosecution.
Participants (5)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kate | person | 631 | View Entity |
| CAROLYN | person | 1336 | View Entity |
| JANE | person | 1277 | View Entity |
| The government | organization | 3113 | View Entity |
| the defendant | person | 996 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00010405.jpg
This legal document is a portion of a filing, likely from the prosecution, arguing against a Defendant's claim of prejudice due to a delay in prosecution. The prosecution asserts that the Defendant has failed to meet the high legal standard for proving prejudice, citing case law. The Defendant's claims are based on the loss of documentary evidence (flight, financial, phone, and property records related to Epstein) and the deaths of four potential witnesses (architects Albert Pinto and Roger Salhi, and property manager Sally Markham).
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Maxwell taught Jane how to massage Epstein, which led to the abuse.
Date unknown
Real Estate Purchase under fake name
Date unknown • Unknown
Carolyn engaged in sex acts with Epstein in exchange for money, arranged by the defendant.
Date unknown
A meeting where the government showed the witness (Visoski) records of three flights.
Date unknown
The defendant conspired with Epstein to traffic Carolyn and other minors for sex.
Date unknown
The defendant personally recruited Virginia while she was a minor.
Date unknown • Virginia
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
The jury convicted the defendant on five counts.
Date unknown
The Government entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein.
2007-01-01
Lawyers for accusers met with the Government to convince them to open an investigation of Ms. Maxwell.
2016-01-01
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event