Event Details
Unknown (Historical)
Description
Issuance of judicial decision
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Judge Aldrich | person | 15 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017188.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or book (likely by Alan Dershowitz) produced during a House Oversight investigation (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017188). It recounts a legal argument Dershowitz made before Judges Julian and Aldrich concerning obscenity laws, privacy, and the 'Griswold v. Conn' precedent. Dershowitz argues that personal offense at the conduct of others is not a sufficient constitutional basis for banning that conduct, a position Judge Aldrich ultimately accepted in his decision.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Legal hearing regarding the film 'I Am Curious Yellow'
Date unknown • Court (likely Boston)
Narrator declined invitation to speak at Judge Aldrich's restricted club
Date unknown • Restricted Club
Legal proceeding regarding First Amendment rights and obscenity laws.
Date unknown • Courtroom (implied)
Legal hearing regarding the obscenity of the film 'I Am Curious Yellow'.
Date unknown • Courtroom
Three days of intensive argument and questioning
Date unknown • Courtroom (implied Massachusetts)
Court hearing involving Alan Dershowitz arguing before Judge Aldrich and Judge Julian regarding obscenity laws and the screening of adult films.
Date unknown • Courtroom (likely Federal Court of Appeals given the judges)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event