Event Details
Date Unknown
Description
A contested trial of Ms. Maxwell where the central issue was the credibility of the accusers. The document argues the trial was unfair due to a juror's omission.
Participants (4)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| accusers | person | 32 | View Entity |
| Juror 50 | person | 685 | View Entity |
| Ms. Maxwell | person | 1982 | View Entity |
| court | location | 177 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009746.jpg
This legal document argues that Ms. Maxwell was denied a fair trial due to material omissions by a juror, identified as Juror 50. The juror failed to disclose his own claimed victim status during jury selection, which prevented the defense from exercising a peremptory challenge and would have been grounds for dismissal for cause. The argument is bolstered by citing the juror's later statements to the media, where he claimed his memory "was like a video" and that he would advocate for the alleged victims' credibility, revealing a bias that tainted the trial.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Ms. Maxwell has been incarcerated for 225 days in de facto solitary confinement, monitored 24 hours a day by guards with a handheld camera.
2021-02-16 • MDC
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
Ms. Maxwell is being forced to prepare for trial with a computer that cannot do research or search documents, which is argued to be an inconceivable condition for preparation.
Date unknown • prison/jail
The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.
Date unknown
Ms. Maxwell sent a detailed letter requesting the production of discovery materials.
2020-10-13
Date referenced regarding Juror 50's testimony/disclosure status
2021-11-04 • N/A
Indictment of Ms. Maxwell.
2020-01-01 • New York
Juror 50 commented on Annie Farmer's Twitter post
2022-01-01 • Twitter
Ms. Maxwell was arrested at her residence.
2020-07-02 • New Hampshire
Ms. Maxwell moved to stay discovery in the case 'Farmer v. Indyke' (No. 19-cv-10475) due to a pending criminal investigation.
Date unknown • S.D.N.Y.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event