Date Unknown
Argument that Juror No. 50's implied and inferable bias requires a new trial.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Juror No. 50 | person | 232 | View Entity |
| GOVERNMENT | organization | 2805 | View Entity |
| court | location | 177 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00009890.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that a new trial is necessary due to the implied and inferable bias of Juror No. 50. The author contends that if the juror had answered voir dire questions truthfully, it would have provided a valid basis for a challenge for cause. The document refutes the government's legal arguments by citing precedents like United States v. Daugerdas and United States v. Torres, and suggests a hearing is needed to evaluate the juror's actual partiality.
Events with shared participants
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
Government conducted multiple in-person interviews with Minor Victim-4, concluding near the end of January 2021.
2021-01-31
Government conducted additional investigation to corroborate Minor Victim-4, including interviewing additional witnesses, reviewing documents, and subpoenaing additional records.
2021-03-31
Filing of Document 82 in Case 20-3061
2020-10-02 • Court
Government sent hard drive with 3500 material via FedEx.
2021-10-11 • FedEx
A legal proceeding where a defendant is tried, involving a jury, judge, and government prosecution.
Date unknown
Government completed internal processes to prepare a superseding indictment (S2 Indictment) and presented it to the grand jury.
2021-03-31
The witness provided a statement to the government, which is the subject of the cross-examination.
2019-09-19
Stages of a legal trial where a defendant's innocence is presumed and the government must prove guilt.
Date unknown
Southern District of Florida court denied Government's motion to unseal grand jury materials.
2025-07-23 • Southern District of Florida
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event