Date Unknown
The CEOS Chief reviewed the prosecution memorandum prepared by Villafaña and opined twice that the charges were appropriate.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CEOS Chief | person | 4 | View Entity |
| Villafaña | person | 551 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00021338.jpg
This legal document analyzes the non-prosecution agreement (NPA) for Jeffrey Epstein in light of the Department of Justice's 'Ashcroft Memo,' which mandates charging the 'most serious readily provable charge.' It contrasts the federal indictment for sex trafficking prepared by prosecutor Villafaña, which carried a 168-210 month sentence, with the eventual plea deal of an 18-month sentence on state charges. The document also reveals internal disagreement, with prosecutors Acosta, Sloman, Menchel, and Lourie perceiving risks in the federal case, while Villafaña and the CEOS Chief believed the charges were appropriate.
Events with shared participants
Correspondence regarding the resolution of a dispute and agreement terms concerning Jeffrey Epstein.
2007-12-13 • Unknown
Villafaña wrote to Epstein attorney Lefkowitz regarding a dispute resolution.
2007-12-13 • Unknown
Resolution of a dispute and negotiation of an agreement regarding Jeffrey Epstein.
2007-12-13 • Unknown
Sloman instructs Villafaña to provide Lefkowitz with draft victim notification letter.
2007-11-28
Lead case agent informed Villafaña that only 15 known victims had received notification letters.
2007-11-28
Villafaña completes draft prosecution memorandum.
2007-05-01
Villafaña sought to avoid defense accusations of misconduct by preparing a written notice to victims.
2007-11-01 • N/A
Sentencing hearing for McDaniel
Date unknown • Courtroom (implied)
Acosta made final edits to the Non-Prosecution Agreement, removing language that required actions from the State Attorney's Office and state court, and sent them to Villafaña.
2007-09-24
Epstein signed the final version of the Non-Prosecution Agreement, and his counsel, Lefkowitz, transmitted the signed copy to Villafaña.
2007-09-24
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event