You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.

Event Details

Unknown

Description

Court hearing regarding jury deliberations and verdict validity (likely the Parse case being cited as precedent).

Participants (3)

Name Type Mentions
Mr. Shechtman person 126 View Entity
MS. DAVIS person 53 View Entity
The Court organization 2003 View Entity

Source Documents (1)

DOJ-OGR-00009501.jpg

Court Transcript / Legal Exhibit • 457 KB
View

This document is page 82 of a court transcript filed on February 24, 2022, as an exhibit (A-5925) in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330). The text captures a legal argument by Ms. Davis referencing the 'Parse' case (likely United States v. Parse) and a letter from juror Catherine Conrad. The argument focuses on the legal distinction between 'wilfully' and 'knowingly' in the context of tax evasion and conspiracy counts, and how the jury's split verdict demonstrates a lack of prejudice and a deliberate decision-making process. This appears to be a citation of precedent used during post-trial motions in the Maxwell trial.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

The Court announced a 15-minute morning break for the jury.

2022-08-10

View

A discussion took place regarding the order of witnesses for the day's trial proceedings.

2022-08-10 • courthouse

View

The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.

Date unknown

View

The Government gave on-the-record assurances to the Court regarding investigative files.

2020-07-14

View

A discussion between attorneys and the court regarding how to respond to a jury note.

2022-08-10 • Courtroom

View

Court proceeding regarding witness strategy in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE).

2022-08-10 • Courtroom

View

Jury Deliberation/Instruction

Date unknown • Courtroom

View

Direct examination of witness 'Kate' in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.

2022-08-10 • Courtroom

View

Initial bail hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell, which was held 12 days after her arrest.

Date unknown

View

An initial bail hearing was held where the Court expressed concerns about COVID-19 and found the Defendant had no underlying health conditions.

Date unknown

View

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
Courtroom
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
3
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-20 20:54

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00009501.jpg
Date String
Unknown

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event