Event Details
December 28, 2020
Description
Filing of Document 102 (Defense Reply Memorandum)
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Defense team | organization | 34 | View Entity |
| court | location | 177 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00020115.jpg
This page from a legal filing (Document 102) outlines arguments by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team refuting the government's claim that she is a flight risk. The defense argues that her use of a trust and pseudonym to buy a home was for protection against harassment, not to hide, and emphasizes her willingness to waive extradition rights to France and the UK. It also addresses conflicting expert opinions regarding whether France would extradite her, contrasting expert William Julié's report with a general letter from the French Ministry of Justice.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
Defense team investigators compiled dossiers on victims.
Date unknown • Not specified
Supreme Court creates new rule regarding 'reckless disregard' and vacates death penalty for Tison brothers.
Date unknown • Washington D.C. / Arizona
The Court is evaluating the Defendant's flight risk and proposed conditions for release, such as renouncing citizenship and financial oversight.
Date unknown
Court ruling declaring recordings inadmissible against President Kuchma.
2004-02-12 • Ukraine
Date the second sharing order was signed according to email recollection.
2020-02-04 • New York
Plea Agreement/Judgment
2007-01-01 • Florida
Investigation of prosecutors' families
Date unknown • Unknown
Evaluation of Maxwell's appeal of a Protective Order.
Date unknown
Voir dire process where Juror 50 stated he had no doubt about his ability to be fair and impartial.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event