Event Details
Unknown (Transcript Date)
Description
Examination of Paul Kane
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Kane | person | 12 | View Entity |
| MR. ROHRBACH | person | 523 | View Entity |
| MS. MENNINGER | person | 1436 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00018101.jpg
This document is an 'Index of Examination' page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It lists the testimony of three witnesses: Paul Kane, Lisa Rocchio, and Juan Patricio Alessi, detailing the attorneys who questioned them (Rohrbach, Menninger, Pomerantz, Comey) and the corresponding page numbers. It also lists various Government Exhibits (Nos. 761, 298, 297, 299, 606, 113, 114, and 2A/2C-2W) and the pages where they were received into evidence.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
A deposition was conducted, as evidenced by the transcript.
Date unknown • Not specified
Court proceeding regarding witness strategy in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE).
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
A witness, Meder, is questioned about a photograph showing Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The photograph, sourced from a CD (1B63) from the Epstein and Maxwell investigation, is admitted into evidence as Plaintiff's Exhibit 342.
2022-08-10 • Court
A discussion took place regarding jury instructions, followed by the court calling a recess.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom in the Southern District
Cross-examination of witness Jane by Ms. Menninger in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
2022-08-10
Court hearing regarding redactions and public release of evidence.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
The Court called a 10-minute break in the proceedings.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom in the Southern District
A legal argument during a court proceeding regarding the admissibility of photographs found in Mr. Epstein's home.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
A discussion took place regarding the procedural rules for the length and scope of the closing and rebuttal arguments.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom in the Southern District
A legal argument took place regarding the definition of 'dominant purpose' for jury instructions in a case involving crossing state lines for criminal sexual conduct.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event