July 05, 2013
The USAO-SDFL filed a brief in a civil case clarifying its position that the NPA was limited to the Southern District of Florida.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| USAO-SDFL | organization | 151 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00002974.jpg
This legal document argues that the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Epstein was strictly limited to the Southern District of Florida (SDFL). It cites a 2013 brief from the USAO-SDFL, an OPR Report, and Department of Justice guidelines to establish that the USAO-SDFL did not have the authority to, and did not intend to, prevent Epstein's prosecution in any other federal district. The central theme is that the NPA was not a 'global resolution' and did not provide nationwide immunity.
Events with shared participants
Approval of Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with USAO-SDFL.
Date unknown
The court holds that the NPA between Epstein and USAO-SDFL does not bind USAO-SDNY.
Date unknown
Negotiation of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) concerning Epstein.
Date unknown • Southern District of Florida
Approval of Epstein’s NPA with USAO-SDFL.
Date unknown
Signing of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between the USAO-SDFL and Epstein.
Date unknown • Southern District of Florida
A Non-Prosecution Agreement was made between the USAO-SDFL and Epstein, deferring federal prosecution in the Southern District of Florida for specific offenses.
Date unknown • Southern District of Florida
Negotiations of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) concerning Epstein.
Date unknown
USAO-SDFL made a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Epstein.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event