September 04, 2020
A Brief for Appellant was cited in the Guzman Loera case.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guzman Loera | person | 16 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00009838.jpg
This legal document, filed on March 11, 2022, argues against the necessity of a hearing based on an anonymous juror's report of misconduct. It cites legal precedents, including United States v. Stewart and United States v. Guzman Loera, to establish that a high standard of "clear, strong, substantial and incontrovertible evidence" is required, which anonymous tips do not meet. The document details the Guzman Loera case as an example where similar allegations of jurors being exposed to prejudicial media did not result in an evidentiary hearing, reinforcing the argument that the current situation does not warrant one either.
Events with shared participants
The trial in the case of United States v. Guzman Loera, where the jury was repeatedly instructed to avoid media coverage.
Date unknown • district court
A ruling was made in the United States v. Guzman Loera case by the Second Circuit.
2022-01-25 • Second Circuit
The trial of United States v. Guzman Loera, during which the district court repeatedly instructed the jury to avoid media coverage.
Date unknown • district court
Ruling in United States v. Guzman Loera, where the Second Circuit affirmed the denial of a hearing based on uncorroborated statements from a juror.
2022-01-01 • Second Circuit
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event