Event Details
Unknown (Transcript Date)
Description
Examination of Janine Gill Velez
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Janine Gill Velez | person | 6 | View Entity |
| MR. ROHRBACH | person | 523 | View Entity |
| Ms. Sternheim | person | 877 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00019124.jpg
This document is the final page (Index of Examination) of a court transcript from the trial United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. It lists the testimony of witnesses Janine Gill Velez, Shawn, Nicole Hesse, and David Rodgers, along with the attorneys conducting the examinations (Rohrbach, Sternheim, Comey, Pagliuca, Moe, Everdell). It also logs the receipt of Government Exhibits 823, 823-R, 105, 1, 2, 3, 662, and 662-R.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Court proceeding regarding witness strategy in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE).
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Direct examination of witness 'Kate' in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
A discussion took place regarding jury instructions, followed by the court calling a recess.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom in the Southern District
The Court called a 10-minute break in the proceedings.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom in the Southern District
The court takes a 45-minute luncheon recess. Proceedings are scheduled to resume with opening statements and conclude for the day at 5 p.m.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
A discussion took place regarding the procedural rules for the length and scope of the closing and rebuttal arguments.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom in the Southern District
A legal argument took place regarding the definition of 'dominant purpose' for jury instructions in a case involving crossing state lines for criminal sexual conduct.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
A charging conference is scheduled for the 18th.
Date unknown • Courtroom
Discussion between the Court and counsel regarding jury instructions, specifically concerning the interpretation of New Mexico law on illegal sexual activity and how evidence should be presented to the jury. The Court indicates it will consider the points raised and re-propose instructions.
2021-12-10 • Courtroom (implied)
A court proceeding involving the direct examination of a witness named Kate.
2022-08-10 • courtroom
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event