Event Details
February 01, 2008
Description
Epstein's process server served Jane Doe at her place of work with a subpoena for a deposition scheduled for February 6, 2008.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mr. Epstein's process servers | person | 0 | View Entity |
| Jane Doe | person | 614 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00030426.jpg
This legal document, page 2 of a filing, details a dispute between opposing counsel regarding the deposition of "Jane Doe." The author, Jane Doe's attorney, alleges that Epstein's attorney, Jack Goldberger, ignored an agreement to find a mutually convenient date and improperly served subpoenas on both Jane Doe and her out-of-state mother for a date he knew Jane Doe's counsel was unavailable. The filing argues that the service on the mother was legally defective.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
An incident at a restaurant where the witness was allegedly avoiding being served legal papers by Mr. Epstein's process servers. It is alleged that Justin lied about the witness's presence and that police were called to remove the witness.
Date unknown • A restaurant (name redacted)
An attempt to serve legal papers on the witness at a restaurant by Mr. Epstein's process servers. The witness was allegedly evading service, and an associate named Justin allegedly lied on their behalf. The involvement of police was also alleged.
Date unknown • A restaurant (name redacted)
An incident at a restaurant where the witness was allegedly evading service from Mr. Epstein's process servers. The questioner alleges the police were called to remove the witness from the restaurant in order to be served.
Date unknown • A restaurant (name redacted)
An attempt to serve legal papers on the witness at a restaurant. It is alleged that Justin lied about the witness's presence and that police were ultimately called to have the witness removed from the restaurant to be served.
Date unknown • A restaurant (name redacted)
An incident at a restaurant where Mr. Epstein's process servers attempted to serve the witness. The police were called. The witness and Mr. Tein provide conflicting accounts of the event.
Date unknown • Restaurant
An incident at a restaurant where Mr. Epstein's process servers attempted to serve the witness. The witness alleges their boss called the police, while Mr. Tein alleges the police were called to remove the witness so they could be served.
Date unknown • A restaurant
An incident occurred at a restaurant where Mr. Epstein's process servers attempted to serve the witness. Mr. Tein alleges the process servers had to involve the police to serve the witness, who then lied about being harassed. The witness denies this and claims their boss called the police.
Date unknown • Restaurant
An incident at a restaurant where process servers for Mr. Epstein attempted to serve the witness. The witness claims their boss called the police, while Mr. Tein alleges the witness lied to avoid service.
Date unknown • a restaurant
An incident at a restaurant where Mr. Epstein's process servers attempted to serve the witness, and the police were called.
Date unknown • A restaurant
A series of parties with minor females were held at a New York City residence used by Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiff, Jane Doe, was allegedly enticed to attend these parties.
Date unknown • A New York City residence
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event