Event Details
February 15, 2012
Description
A court hearing in the case of U.S. v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al., involving the testimony of a witness (Conrad) who admitted to perjury, discussion of an arrest warrant for her, and scheduling of subsequent witnesses.
Participants (7)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mr. Gair | person | 86 | View Entity |
| Mr. Shechtman | person | 126 | View Entity |
| MS. MCCARTHY | person | 25 | View Entity |
| Conrad | person | 113 | View Entity |
| Mr. Rotert | person | 22 | View Entity |
| MR. OKULA | person | 182 | View Entity |
| The Court | organization | 2003 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009952.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, in the case of U.S. v. Paul M. Daugerdas. A witness, Conrad, apologizes for committing perjury to serve on a jury; the court acknowledges an arrest warrant for her but decides to release her. The attorneys discuss the scheduling of future witnesses, including a U.S. Marshal and a law student, before the court adjourns until the following morning.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The Court announced a 15-minute morning break for the jury.
2022-08-10
A discussion took place regarding the order of witnesses for the day's trial proceedings.
2022-08-10 • courthouse
The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.
Date unknown
The Government gave on-the-record assurances to the Court regarding investigative files.
2020-07-14
A discussion between attorneys and the court regarding how to respond to a jury note.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Court proceeding regarding witness strategy in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE).
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Jury Deliberation/Instruction
Date unknown • Courtroom
Direct examination of witness 'Kate' in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Initial bail hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell, which was held 12 days after her arrest.
Date unknown
An initial bail hearing was held where the Court expressed concerns about COVID-19 and found the Defendant had no underlying health conditions.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event