Event Details

Unknown (prior to appeal)

Description

Maxwell filed a letter seeking reconsideration of the District Court's response.

Participants (3)

Name Type Mentions
MAXWELL person 1792 View Entity
GHISLAINE MAXWELL person 9575 View Entity
district court organization 595 View Entity

Source Documents (2)

DOJ-OGR-00000081.tif

Legal Document/Court Filing (Appeal Decision) • 41.4 KB
View

This document details an appeal by Maxwell challenging a District Court's denial related to a constructive amendment or prejudicial variance in an indictment. Maxwell argues that testimony regarding a witness's sexual abuse in New Mexico created a new basis for conviction distinct from the original indictment, and that jury instructions regarding the transportation of 'Jane' for sexual activity constituted a constructive amendment. The document affirms the District Court's denial, citing legal precedents for interpreting the Grand Jury Clause and constructive amendment claims.

DOJ-OGR-00021814.jpg

Legal Opinion / Appellate Court Document • 683 KB
View

This document is page 20 of a legal filing (likely an appellate opinion) dated September 17, 2024. It details Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal regarding a 'constructive amendment' or 'prejudicial variance' of her indictment, specifically concerning testimony about sexual abuse in New Mexico. The court affirms the District Court's denial of Maxwell's motion.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

Notice of Appearance as Substitute Counsel filed on behalf of Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell

2021-03-30 • 02nd Circuit Court of Appeals

View

A shipment discussed in court, sent from Ghislaine Maxwell to Casey Wasserman. The event is stated to have occurred in 'October'.

Date unknown

View

Maxwell taught Jane how to massage Epstein, which led to the abuse.

Date unknown

View

LETTER REPLY TO RESPONSE to Motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell.

2020-07-29

View

Filing or processing of the Reply Memorandum in Support of Third Motion for Bail

2021-04-01 • Federal Court (Implied)

View

The appeal by Defendant-Appellant Maxwell was dismissed, and the motion to consolidate was denied as moot.

2020-10-19

View

Carolyn testifies that Maxwell, two of Mr. Epstein's friends, and two other girls saw her fully naked in a massage room.

Date unknown • massage room at Jeffrey Epstein's house

View

Early phase of the conspiracy where Maxwell and Epstein identified, isolated, groomed, and sexually abused vulnerable girls.

1994-01-01

View

Filing of Document 172-1 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN

2021-03-23 • US District Court

View

Later phase of the scheme where Maxwell and Epstein developed a stream of girls who recruited each other to visit Epstein's Palm Beach residence, where they were paid.

2001-01-01 • Palm Beach residence

View

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
District Court
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
3
Source Documents
2
Extracted
2025-11-21 00:18

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00021814.jpg
Date String
Unknown (prior to appeal)

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event