Event Details
January 01, 2014
Description
The court decision in Vickers, 2014 WL 1838255, which held that Section 3283 does not require a sexual act between a defendant and a specific child.
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vickers | person | 26 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00002999.jpg
This legal document, a page from a court filing, presents an argument against a defendant's motion. The author contends that Section 3283, concerning sexual abuse offenses, should be interpreted broadly, citing precedents like 'Vickers' and 'Schneider'. The document argues that the defendant's reliance on the 'essential ingredients' test from 'Bridges v. United States' is misplaced because that case dealt with a different, more narrowly drafted statute (the Wartime Suspension of Limitations Act) and is therefore inapplicable.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The ruling in United States v. Vickers, No. 13 Cr. 128 (RJA), 2014 WL 1838255.
2014-05-08 • W.D.N.Y.
The W.D.N.Y. court ruled in United States v. Vickers.
2014-05-08 • W.D.N.Y.
Citation for United States v. Vickers, 708 F. App’x 732
2017-01-01 • 2d Cir.
Citation for United States v. Vickers, No. 13 Cr. 128 (RJA) (HKS), 2014 WL 1838255
2014-05-08 • W.D.N.Y.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event