Event Details
August 22, 2022
Description
An attorney, Mr. Everdell, makes an argument to the court about the authoritative nature of a sentencing guideline's commentary. The opposing counsel, Ms. Moe, declines to respond verbally.
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ms. Moe | person | 1588 | View Entity |
| Mr. Everdell | person | 1327 | View Entity |
| The Court | organization | 2003 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00014782.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court proceeding on August 22, 2022, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. An attorney, Mr. Everdell, argues that the commentary on a sentencing guideline for 'dangerous sex offenders' is authoritative guidance from the Sentencing Commission and should be considered by the court. The opposing counsel, Ms. Moe, declines to offer a verbal rebuttal, choosing to rest on her previously filed written arguments.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The Court announced a 15-minute morning break for the jury.
2022-08-10
Cross-examination of witness Visoski by Mr. Everdell regarding flights and the identity of a passenger named Jane.
2022-08-10
A discussion took place regarding the order of witnesses for the day's trial proceedings.
2022-08-10 • courthouse
The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.
Date unknown
The Government gave on-the-record assurances to the Court regarding investigative files.
2020-07-14
A discussion between attorneys and the court regarding how to respond to a jury note.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
A summation by Ms. Moe recounting Jane's testimony was filed with the court.
2022-08-10
Court proceeding regarding witness strategy in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE).
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Direct examination of witness Hesse regarding message taking procedures.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Jury Deliberation/Instruction
Date unknown • Courtroom
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event