Date Unknown
A legal argument is being made to exclude the expert testimony of Rocchio regarding grooming.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rocchio | person | 289 | View Entity |
| The government | organization | 3113 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00005639.jpg
This document is a legal filing, specifically page 15 of Document 386 in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 29, 2021. The author argues that the expert testimony of an individual named Rocchio regarding 'grooming' should be deemed inadmissible because it is not based on scientific studies, is too general, and will not help the jury understand the specific facts of the case. The argument relies on legal precedents from cases like Daubert, Raymond, and Gonyer to assert that Rocchio's opinions do not meet the standard for expert testimony.
Events with shared participants
A meeting where the government showed the witness (Visoski) records of three flights.
Date unknown
The Government entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein.
2007-01-01
Lawyers for accusers met with the Government to convince them to open an investigation of Ms. Maxwell.
2016-01-01
The Government gave on-the-record assurances to the Court regarding investigative files.
2020-07-14
The Government opposed the Defendant’s motion for release on bail.
2021-03-09
Victims filed discovery requests with the Government, seeking information about Dershowitz, Prince Andrew, and others.
2011-10-11 • Federal court (S.D. Fla.)
Filing of Government's conclusion requesting dismissal of Maxwell's appeal.
2020-09-16 • New York, New York
The Court issued an order setting a briefing schedule for Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed bail motion, with submissions due on December 8, 16, and 18, 2020.
2020-12-07
Tentative trial date set by the court.
2020-06-08 • Courtroom
Filing of Document 185-1 in Case 1:17-cr-00548-PAC.
2021-03-24 • Court (Southern District of NY implied via White Plains)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event