Event Details
August 21, 2017
Description
A court ruling in U.S. v. Lindemuth applied the Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws to determine which jurisdiction's law governed a federal plea agreement.
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lindemuth | person | 4 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00021088.jpg
legal document
• 705 KB
This page from a legal document argues that the Court's precedents do not require applying the 'Annabi' canon to agreements formed outside its Circuit. It cites several cases to support the position that federal plea agreements should be analyzed under general choice-of-law principles for contracts, highlighting a magistrate judge's questioning of the current practice.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
U.S. v. Lindemuth, Case No. 16-40047-01-DDC
2017-08-21 • District of Kansas
Event Metadata
Type
legal proceeding
Location
D. Kan.
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
1
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-20 15:14
Additional Data
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021088.jpg
Date String
2017-08-21
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event