December 21, 2019
The Post moved the Court for an order unsealing appellate briefs (Note: The text says 2019, but context suggests 2018 given the subsequent Jan 2, 2019 date).
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Post | organization | 88 | View Entity |
| The Court | organization | 2003 | View Entity |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016496.jpg
This document is page 9 of a legal filing outlining a dispute between 'The Post' and the Manhattan District Attorney's Office regarding the unsealing of appellate briefs related to Jeffrey Epstein. The text highlights that while Epstein's counsel took 'no position' on the unsealing, the DA's office reversed its initial stance of 'not opposing' the motion and subsequently opposed it, arguing that the Post failed to notify prosecutors in Florida. The document includes a footnote disputing the legal necessity of notifying Florida prosecutors.
Events with shared participants
The Court announced a 15-minute morning break for the jury.
2022-08-10
A discussion took place regarding the order of witnesses for the day's trial proceedings.
2022-08-10 • courthouse
The Post's Motion
Date unknown • Court
The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.
Date unknown
Motion by 'The Post' to unseal or produce appellate briefs.
Date unknown • Court
The Government gave on-the-record assurances to the Court regarding investigative files.
2020-07-14
A discussion between attorneys and the court regarding how to respond to a jury note.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
The Post filed a motion to unseal appellate briefs.
2018-12-21 • Manhattan (implied)
Filing of a letter withdrawing the December 21 Motion to address procedural issues.
2019-01-04 • Court
The Post filed a motion requesting an order unsealing appellate briefs with victim names redacted.
2018-12-21 • Manhattan (implied court)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event