Event Details

This is page 4 of a 16-page legal document filed on February 4, 2021, in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. The page, labeled 'iii', is a table of 'Other Authorities' listing legal statutes, including the UK's Sexual Offences Act 2003 and two US federal acts: the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994. A Department of Justice Bates number is visible at the bottom.

This legal document is a motion arguing that the government must demonstrate the admissibility of any evidence related to 'Accuser-3' under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b). The filing asserts that this evidence constitutes 'other acts' evidence, which is typically inadmissible to prove character, and therefore its relevance and purpose must be formally litigated before being introduced at trial.

This document is page 11 of a legal filing (Document 146) from the Ghislaine Maxwell case, dated February 4, 2021. The defense argues that allegations regarding 'Accuser-3' are time-barred because the statute of limitations expired before the 2003 amendment to 18 U.S.C. § 3283, and retroactive application would violate the Ex Post Facto Clause. Furthermore, the defense contends that allegations involving Accuser-3 are irrelevant to the conspiracy charges, which should only pertain to Accuser-1 and Accuser-2.

This document is the Table of Contents for a legal filing (Document 146) in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on February 4, 2021. The filing outlines arguments to strike references to 'Accuser-3' from the indictment, claiming they are surplusage, irrelevant to the alleged conspiracies, and unduly prejudicial to Ms. Maxwell. Alternatively, it argues the Government should be required to demonstrate the admissibility of evidence regarding Accuser-3.