Event Details
August 08, 2022
Description
Mr. Pagliuca raised an issue with the government and was assured they would not pursue a certain line of questioning. This is referenced as having happened "two days ago".
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GOVERNMENT | organization | 2805 | View Entity |
| MR. PAGLIUCA | person | 1022 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00017926.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument during the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio. An attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, objects to a question from Ms. Pomerantz, claiming it violates a prior agreement with the government. The Court sustains the objection, expressing bafflement at the apparent misunderstanding or breach of the agreement.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Deposition of an unnamed witness conducted by Mr. Edwards, with Mr. Pagliuca present as counsel. The topic is photographs taken by an unnamed male.
Date unknown • Not mentioned
A discussion between attorneys and the court regarding how to respond to a jury note.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Government conducted multiple in-person interviews with Minor Victim-4, concluding near the end of January 2021.
2021-01-31
Government conducted additional investigation to corroborate Minor Victim-4, including interviewing additional witnesses, reviewing documents, and subpoenaing additional records.
2021-03-31
Filing of Document 82 in Case 20-3061
2020-10-02 • Court
Government sent hard drive with 3500 material via FedEx.
2021-10-11 • FedEx
A legal proceeding where a defendant is tried, involving a jury, judge, and government prosecution.
Date unknown
Court proceeding regarding Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Legal argument regarding 'omission theory' and inconsistency in testimony.
2022-08-10 • Southern District of New York (implied by court reporters)
The conclusion of a cross-examination of witness Dr. Dubin by Ms. Moe, an objection by Mr. Pagliuca, and the witness being excused by the court.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom (implied)
Government completed internal processes to prepare a superseding indictment (S2 Indictment) and presented it to the grand jury.
2021-03-31
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event