Event Details
January 01, 2008
Description
A judge permitted victim Wild to receive access to the NPA pursuant to a protective order.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wild | person | 46 | View Entity |
| Unnamed Judge | person | 11 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00021483.jpg
This legal document details an Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) investigation into the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case, specifically the failure of government officials Villafaña, Acosta, and Sloman to consult with victims before or after signing a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The OPR found that while the officials' actions were not intended to protect Epstein, their decision to withhold information from victims—stemming from a concern about creating impeachment evidence for a potential trial—was flawed and negatively impacted the victims' sense of fairness. The document highlights the experience of victim Wild, who felt misled, and notes that a more straightforward approach with victims would have been better practice.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Author formally charged with criminally defaming a judge.
Date unknown • Unknown
A judge addresses a dispute between counsel regarding the scope of questioning during a witness's (Rocchio's) direct examination, ultimately sustaining an objection.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom in the Southern District
A judge extended daily jury deliberations by one hour due to an 'astronomical spike' in COVID-19 cases (omicron variant) in New York City, to mitigate the risk of trial disruption from potential quarantines.
2022-08-10 • New York City
A legal argument is presented by counsel (Mr. Everdell) to a judge regarding the appropriate sentencing guidelines (2003 vs. 2004) and whether the jury should have made the determination based on the Ex Post Facto Clause.
2023-06-29 • Courtroom (implied)
A judge imposes a sentence on Ms. Maxwell, including five years of supervised release, a $750,000 fine, and a mandatory special assessment.
2022-07-22 • Courtroom (implied)
The FBI interviewed victim Wild but did not inform her that a potential outcome of the case was a state plea.
2007-01-01
A judge overrules a defendant's objection to a sentencing enhancement for undue influence in a commercial sex act involving a minor.
2023-06-29 • Court (implied)
A court hearing where the judge discusses the process for deciding on Mr. Epstein's bail, acknowledging the presence of victims and setting a date for the decision.
Date unknown • Courtroom
The judge will give their decision on the defendant's bail.
2019-07-18 • Courtroom 17B
The FBI told Wild and two other victims that the case had been resolved.
2007-01-01
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event