Event Details
Unspecified (Future relative to transcript)
Description
Briefing on Government Exhibit 52.
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR. ROHRBACH | person | 523 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00013406.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a dialogue between the Judge ('The Court') and Ms. Comey regarding 'Government Exhibit 52' and whether the defense had an opportunity to cross-examine a witness named Mr. Alessi. The Judge notes a potential misunderstanding about the defense's opportunity to cross-examine, while Ms. Comey asserts that extensive examination and voir dire of Mr. Alessi occurred.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Court proceeding regarding witness strategy in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE).
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
A discussion took place regarding jury instructions, followed by the court calling a recess.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom in the Southern District
The Court called a 10-minute break in the proceedings.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom in the Southern District
A legal argument took place regarding the definition of 'dominant purpose' for jury instructions in a case involving crossing state lines for criminal sexual conduct.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Discussion between the Court and counsel regarding jury instructions, specifically concerning the interpretation of New Mexico law on illegal sexual activity and how evidence should be presented to the jury. The Court indicates it will consider the points raised and re-propose instructions.
2021-12-10 • Courtroom (implied)
Cross-examination of witness Ms. Chapell by attorney Mr. Everdell in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
A discussion in court regarding the testimony and evidence for Exhibit 52.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom (implied)
A court hearing where the admissibility of testimony from Mr. Grumbridge and Dr. Loftus is being discussed.
2022-08-10
Legal arguments are being made regarding a defendant's active participation in offenses, the sufficiency of proof at trial, and the potential application of a 'conscious avoidance theory' instruction to the jury, particularly concerning cases involving children.
2022-08-10 • court
A discussion in court with the jury not present, where a witness is excused and procedural matters regarding inconsistent statements are discussed between the judge and attorneys.
2022-08-10
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event