Event Details
December 10, 2020
Description
A speaker, likely a defense attorney, is arguing for their client's release on conditions, citing legal precedent regarding victims' rights.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unnamed speaker (attorney) | person | 0 | View Entity |
| your Honor | person | 807 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00001922.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated December 10, 2020, where an attorney argues for a client's release. The attorney cites a 2005 opinion by Judge Orenstein in *United States v. Turner* to support the argument that while victims have a right to be heard, this right does not constitute a veto over a defendant's release, especially when conditions can be set to ensure the defendant's appearance in court.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
A court hearing where an attorney is making an argument to a judge.
Date unknown
An attorney makes a statement to the judge regarding the scope of Mr. Flatley's testimony.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Cross-examination of witness Loftus regarding the nature of memory studies they have conducted.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Mr. Everdell questions witness Mr. Sud about his residence and his employment history and role at Shoppers Travel.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom (implied)
A summation is being given in a trial, arguing that accusers' memories have shifted over time.
Date unknown • Courtroom
A long trial is mentioned as the context for the events being discussed.
Date unknown • Court
Legal arguments are being made regarding a defendant's active participation in offenses, the sufficiency of proof at trial, and the potential application of a 'conscious avoidance theory' instruction to the jury, particularly concerning cases involving children.
2022-08-10 • court
Ms. Brune is giving testimony under direct examination.
Date unknown • Courtroom
A court hearing where the government is arguing that the defendant is a flight risk and should not be released.
2021-04-01 • United States
A lawyer is presenting arguments to a judge regarding a client's case, discussing past conduct (1994-1997), bail factors (3142 factors), and the client's custody. The judge interrupts to ask for clarification from Mr. Cohen.
Date unknown • Court (implied by 'THE COURT', 'Second Circuit', 'Supreme Court', 'Southern District')
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event