Event Details
Unknown (prior to testimony)
Description
Conversation while walking to 52 Duane
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ms. Edelstein | person | 38 | View Entity |
| Brune | person | 216 | View Entity |
| Ms. Trzaskoma | person | 103 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00010020.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (filed August 4, 2022) featuring the direct testimony of a witness named Brune. Brune describes a conversation with colleagues Ms. Trzaskoma and Ms. Edelstein (Theresa) while walking to 52 Duane, concerning suspicions that 'Juror No. 1' might be a suspended lawyer. They discuss the juror's background revealed during voir dire, specifically a personal injury suit in the Bronx, and the juror's use of legal concepts like 'vicarious liability' and 'respondeat superior' which the witness notes are out of place in a criminal case.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Investigation requested by Ms. Trzaskoma.
0012-05-01 • Unknown
A discussion was held regarding Catherine Conrad's potential status as a suspended lawyer, prompted by Ms. Trzaskoma. The group reviewed voir dire responses and decided against further research.
Date unknown
Ms. Brune is giving testimony under direct examination.
Date unknown • Courtroom
Ms. Edelstein looked at a letter, took a phone number from it, and verified it on the Bar website.
Date unknown
A direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding the legal team and paralegals involved in the 'Parma matter'.
Date unknown • Unspecified
Direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding the jury selection process (voir dire).
Date unknown
A past voir dire process is discussed, where the plan was for Judge Pauley to question potential juror Catherine M. Conrad to determine if she was the same person from a court opinion.
Date unknown
An unidentified questioner is cross-examining a witness, Ms. Edelstein, about the contents of a legal brief.
Date unknown
A past event where Ms. Edelstein allegedly stood at a podium and raised her voice at Dr. DeRosa for not answering her questions.
Date unknown • podium
Direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding their legal experience and a specific trial.
Date unknown • Courtroom (implied)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event