Event Details
July 01, 2008
Description
USAO response to plaintiffs' emergency petition regarding the Crime Victim Rights Act.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plaintiffs | person | 35 | View Entity |
| USAO | organization | 691 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013409.jpg
This document is a printed webpage from the Palm Beach Daily News dated April 7, 2011, reporting on a motion filed by attorneys representing victims (Doe 1 and 2) to invalidate Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement. The motion argues the agreement is illegal because the government failed to notify victims as required by the Crime Victim Rights Act, allegedly to protect Epstein due to his political connections. The article includes comments from U.S. Attorney's Office spokesperson Alicia Valle denying CVRA violations because no federal charges were filed.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Legal Opinion / Reconsideration ruling
2005-01-01 • Court
Court Opinion Issued
2005-01-01 • S.D.N.Y.
Publication/Filing of this court opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765).
2005-01-01 • S.D.N.Y.
Epstein's attorneys challenged the USAO's position regarding victim notification.
2007-12-01 • N/A
Legal Opinion/Case Proceeding
2012-01-01 • Legal Record
Legal Filing/Opinion
2012-01-01 • Court
Conference call regarding the review of Epstein's devices.
2020-10-19 • Teleconference
USAO's decision to notify victims about eligibility for monetary damages under § 2255, implemented by letters after Epstein's state pleas.
Date unknown • N/A
Defendant points the Court to civil law regarding plaintiffs proceeding by pseudonyms
Date unknown
Negotiations between Epstein's legal team and the USAO, resulting in benefits for Epstein such as a reduction in prison time and other concessions.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event