Event Details
Date Unknown
Description
The jury deliberated for multiple days, asking for testimony and evidence, and returned a split verdict.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jury | person | 126 | View Entity |
| Juror 50 | person | 685 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009822.jpg
This legal document argues that there is no evidence of actual bias from Juror 50 in the trial of a defendant named Maxwell. It cites the juror's public statements affirming his belief in the presumption of innocence, the jury's careful deliberations, and his answers during voir dire as proof of his impartiality. The document contrasts this with the defendant's claims that the juror made prejudicial statements after the trial, such as calling her a 'predator'.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The Court announced a 15-minute morning break for the jury.
2022-08-10
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
The jury convicted the defendant on five counts.
Date unknown
The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.
Date unknown
Direct examination of witness 'Kate' in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Projected start of opening statements.
2021-11-29 • SDNY
Date referenced regarding Juror 50's testimony/disclosure status
2021-11-04 • N/A
Juror 50 commented on Annie Farmer's Twitter post
2022-01-01 • Twitter
An ongoing trial is mentioned, for which exhibits are being prepared and presented.
Date unknown • Courtroom (implied)
The jury's first task is to choose a foreperson.
Date unknown • Jury Room
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event