Event Details

April 06, 2009

Description

Decision in the case of U.S. v. Ashraf.

Participants (2)

Name Type Mentions
Ashraf person 10 View Entity
U.S. person 8 View Entity

Source Documents (1)

DOJ-OGR-00021842.jpg

legal document • 844 KB
View

This document is a page from a legal filing that critiques the reasoning of a prior court decision, 'Annabi'. The author argues that 'Annabi' departed from the established legal doctrine that a plea agreement with a specific U.S. Attorney's Office (USAO) only binds that office, not the entire U.S. government, unless explicitly stated otherwise. The text cites numerous other cases in its footnotes to support this traditional, more limited interpretation of such agreements.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

Joint military exercises conducted by the U.S. and South Korea.

Date unknown • The region (Korean Peninsula)

View

The Trump administration announced that the U.S. would no longer fund the UN Relief and Works Agency (UNWRA).

Date unknown

View

The U.S. was set to resume trade talks with the E.U.

2018-09-23

View

The U.S. was scheduled to resume trade talks with the E.U.

2018-09-23

View

Discussion of the legal case 'U.S. v. Khashoggi'

Date unknown

View

Discussion of the legal case 'U.S. v. Bodmer'

Date unknown

View

U.S. women winning the World Cup

Date unknown • Unknown

View

Discussion of the legal case 'U.S. v. Hanson'

Date unknown

View

A Chinese Jin Class Submarine launched an Intercontinental ballistic missile in the Atlantic Ocean.

2014-08-11 • Atlantic Ocean

View

United States v. Rubin court decision

2008-01-01 • Eastern District of New York

View

Event Metadata

Type
Legal case decision
Location
2d Cir.
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
2
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-20 15:19

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00021842.jpg
Date String
2009-04-06

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event