Event Details
December 10, 2020
Description
Court Hearing / Bail Hearing
Participants (6)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| prosecution | person | 6 | View Entity |
| Judge | person | 227 | View Entity |
| MR. COHEN | person | 88 | View Entity |
| The Court | organization | 2003 | View Entity |
| Defense | organization | 240 | View Entity |
| Unidentified family/friends on call | person | 0 | View Entity |
Source Documents (2)
DOJ-OGR-00001904.jpg
This document is page 27 of a court transcript from December 10, 2020, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecution argues that the defendant poses a significant flight risk because she holds citizenship in France (which does not extradite its citizens) and the UK, owns property abroad, and possesses 'significant and undetermined and undisclosed wealth.' The government expresses concern that she could live indefinitely beyond the reach of US extradition.
DOJ-OGR-00001920.jpg
This document is page 43 of a court transcript from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330), dated December 10, 2020. Defense attorney Mr. Cohen argues that the government has unfairly introduced new facts late in the proceeding, preventing a written response. He attempts to distance his client from Jeffrey Epstein, stating she is 'not the monster' portrayed by the media and emphasizes her strong family and professional ties, noting that supporters are present on the call anonymously for safety reasons.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The Court announced a 15-minute morning break for the jury.
2022-08-10
A discussion took place regarding the order of witnesses for the day's trial proceedings.
2022-08-10 • courthouse
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.
Date unknown
The Government gave on-the-record assurances to the Court regarding investigative files.
2020-07-14
Discussion of factors determining if a government agency is part of the 'prosecution team' for discovery purposes.
Date unknown
A discussion between attorneys and the court regarding how to respond to a jury note.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Court proceeding regarding witness strategy in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE).
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Jury Deliberation/Instruction
Date unknown • Courtroom
Direct examination of witness 'Kate' in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event