Event Details

January 01, 2019

Description

Court-1 permitted modification of protective order; Court-2 did not.

Participants (3)

Name Type Mentions
Court-1 organization 33 View Entity
Court-2 organization 35 View Entity
GOVERNMENT organization 2805 View Entity

Source Documents (2)

EFTA00026705.pdf

Memorandum Opinion and Order • 320 KB
View

Judge Alison J. Nathan denied Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to modify a protective order that would have allowed her to use criminal discovery materials in separate civil cases. The Judge ruled that Maxwell failed to show good cause or relevance for the disclosure. However, the Court permitted Maxwell to disclose specific facts to the relevant civil courts regarding the history of grand jury subpoenas issued to an unnamed 'Recipient' and previous rulings by other courts ('Court-1' and 'Court-2') regarding those materials.

EFTA00028055.pdf

Memorandum Opinion and Order • 324 KB
View

Memorandum Opinion and Order by Judge Alison J. Nathan in US v. Maxwell denying the defendant's request to broadly modify a protective order to use criminal discovery documents in civil cases. The Court found Maxwell failed to show good cause or relevance for the modification. However, the Court permitted Maxwell to share specific factual information regarding grand jury subpoenas and prior rulings by other courts ('Court-1' and 'Court-2') with relevant judicial officers under seal, as these facts were largely public record.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

Government conducted multiple in-person interviews with Minor Victim-4, concluding near the end of January 2021.

2021-01-31

View

Government conducted additional investigation to corroborate Minor Victim-4, including interviewing additional witnesses, reviewing documents, and subpoenaing additional records.

2021-03-31

View

Filing of Document 82 in Case 20-3061

2020-10-02 • Court

View

Government sent hard drive with 3500 material via FedEx.

2021-10-11 • FedEx

View

A legal proceeding where a defendant is tried, involving a jury, judge, and government prosecution.

Date unknown

View

Government completed internal processes to prepare a superseding indictment (S2 Indictment) and presented it to the grand jury.

2021-03-31

View

The witness provided a statement to the government, which is the subject of the cross-examination.

2019-09-19

View

Stages of a legal trial where a defendant's innocence is presumed and the government must prove guilt.

Date unknown

View

Southern District of Florida court denied Government's motion to unseal grand jury materials.

2025-07-23 • Southern District of Florida

View

Ms. Maxwell was arrested at her residence.

2020-07-02 • New Hampshire

View

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
Unknown Civil Courts
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
3
Source Documents
2
Extracted
2025-12-26 00:20

Additional Data

Source
EFTA00028055.pdf
Date String
2019-04

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event