Event Details
April 01, 2022
Description
Jury Selection/Questionnaire Completion
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Juror 50 | person | 685 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00010326.jpg
This document is page 3 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated April 1, 2022. The text details the Court's findings regarding 'Juror 50,' concluding that the juror's inaccurate answers on a selection questionnaire were due to rushing/distraction rather than deliberate deception. The Court asserts that even if Juror 50 had disclosed his history of sexual abuse accurately, he would not have been struck for cause because he demonstrated the ability to serve fairly and impartially.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.
Date unknown
Date referenced regarding Juror 50's testimony/disclosure status
2021-11-04 • N/A
Juror 50 commented on Annie Farmer's Twitter post
2022-01-01 • Twitter
A potential juror (ID 50) answers a questionnaire to determine their suitability to serve on a jury.
Date unknown
A Post-Verdict Hearing where Juror 50 allegedly lied to the Court.
Date unknown • The Court
Voir Dire process where Juror 50 allegedly concealed material information and gave false answers.
Date unknown
Voir dire process where Juror 50 stated he had no doubt about his ability to be fair and impartial.
Date unknown
A hearing where Juror 50 provided testimony.
Date unknown
A close, contested trial involving Ms. Maxwell where the key issue was the credibility of the accusers.
Date unknown
During the jury selection for Ms. Maxwell's trial, Juror 50 failed to disclose his claimed victim status, which is argued to have robbed Ms. Maxwell of a fair trial.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event