Event Details
August 10, 2022
Description
Court proceeding regarding jury instructions and legal definitions in Case 1:20-cr-00330.
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ms. Moe | person | 1588 | View Entity |
| Mr. Everdell | person | 1327 | View Entity |
| The Court | organization | 2003 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00017308.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, associated with Case 1:20-cr-00330 (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It details a discussion between the Judge ('The Court'), defense attorney Mr. Everdell, and prosecutor Ms. Moe regarding the legal definition of the word 'entice' for jury instructions. The Judge cites specific case law (*Almonte*, *Dupigny*, and *Broxmeyer*) to define the term as 'to attract, induce, or lure using hope or desire.'
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The Court announced a 15-minute morning break for the jury.
2022-08-10
Cross-examination of witness Visoski by Mr. Everdell regarding flights and the identity of a passenger named Jane.
2022-08-10
A discussion took place regarding the order of witnesses for the day's trial proceedings.
2022-08-10 • courthouse
The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.
Date unknown
The Government gave on-the-record assurances to the Court regarding investigative files.
2020-07-14
A discussion between attorneys and the court regarding how to respond to a jury note.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
A summation by Ms. Moe recounting Jane's testimony was filed with the court.
2022-08-10
Court proceeding regarding witness strategy in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE).
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Direct examination of witness Hesse regarding message taking procedures.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Jury Deliberation/Instruction
Date unknown • Courtroom
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event