Event Details
Date Unknown
Description
Juror 50 described the jury's deliberation process, which involved reading instructions, methodically working through counts, writing evidence on a whiteboard, and deliberating towards a consensus.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The jury | person | 103 | View Entity |
| Juror 50 | person | 685 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009131.jpg
This legal document, filed on February 24, 2022, is an argument against a defendant's motion for a new trial. It cites legal precedent to establish the high standard for granting such motions and uses statements from 'Juror 50' to The Daily Mail to demonstrate the jury's deliberation process was diligent and fair. The juror's account is presented as evidence that the verdict was based on a methodical review of the evidence without undue pressure, thereby undermining the defendant's motion.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.
Date unknown
Date referenced regarding Juror 50's testimony/disclosure status
2021-11-04 • N/A
Juror 50 commented on Annie Farmer's Twitter post
2022-01-01 • Twitter
The jury is instructed on how to conduct their deliberations in the criminal case against Ms. Maxwell.
2021-12-19
A potential juror (ID 50) answers a questionnaire to determine their suitability to serve on a jury.
Date unknown
A Post-Verdict Hearing where Juror 50 allegedly lied to the Court.
Date unknown • The Court
Voir Dire process where Juror 50 allegedly concealed material information and gave false answers.
Date unknown
A jury charge on 'conscious avoidance' or 'willful blindness' was given as part of a criminal trial.
2022-08-10
Voir dire process where Juror 50 stated he had no doubt about his ability to be fair and impartial.
Date unknown
A hearing where Juror 50 provided testimony.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event