Event Details
January 10, 2022
Description
Counsel for Juror 50 filed a motion to intervene and a supporting memorandum of law.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Counsel for Juror 50 | person | 8 | View Entity |
| Juror 50 | person | 685 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009163.jpg
This page is from a Government filing (Document 615) dated February 24, 2022, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The text argues against the defendant's request to subpoena 'Juror 50's' social media records, citing the Stored Communications Act and privacy concerns. It also discusses a previous motion filed by Juror 50's counsel on January 10, 2022, seeking to intervene to protect the juror's rights against self-incrimination.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.
Date unknown
Date referenced regarding Juror 50's testimony/disclosure status
2021-11-04 • N/A
Juror 50 commented on Annie Farmer's Twitter post
2022-01-01 • Twitter
A potential juror (ID 50) answers a questionnaire to determine their suitability to serve on a jury.
Date unknown
A Post-Verdict Hearing where Juror 50 allegedly lied to the Court.
Date unknown • The Court
Voir Dire process where Juror 50 allegedly concealed material information and gave false answers.
Date unknown
Voir dire process where Juror 50 stated he had no doubt about his ability to be fair and impartial.
Date unknown
A hearing where Juror 50 provided testimony.
Date unknown
A close, contested trial involving Ms. Maxwell where the key issue was the credibility of the accusers.
Date unknown
During the jury selection for Ms. Maxwell's trial, Juror 50 failed to disclose his claimed victim status, which is argued to have robbed Ms. Maxwell of a fair trial.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event